Add Attributes To A Simpletype Or Restriction To A Complextype In Xml Schema


Answer :

To add attributes you have to derive by extension, to add facets you have to derive by restriction. Therefore this has to be done in two steps for the element's child content. The attribute can be defined inline:

<xsd:simpleType name="timeValueType">   <xsd:restriction base="xsd:token">     <xsd:pattern value="\d{2}:\d{2}"/>   </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType>  <xsd:complexType name="timeType">   <xsd:simpleContent>     <xsd:extension base="timeValueType">       <xsd:attribute name="format">         <xsd:simpleType>           <xsd:restriction base="xsd:token">             <xsd:enumeration value="seconds"/>             <xsd:enumeration value="minutes"/>             <xsd:enumeration value="hours"/>           </xsd:restriction>         </xsd:simpleType>       </xsd:attribute>     </xsd:extension>   </xsd:simpleContent> </xsd:complexType>

I'd like to propose my example with more detailed explanation what actually require for mixing up inherited type with restrictions while adding attribute.

this is the place you define your inherited type (in my case it's xs:string based one with field lenght 1024 restriction applied). you can't have this as a standard type for your field as you are going to add an "attribute" to your field too.

  <xs:simpleType name="string1024Type">     <xs:restriction base="xs:string">       <xs:maxLength value="1024"/>     </xs:restriction>   </xs:simpleType>

this is the place where your element is defined based on your private type (in my case it's "string1024Type") and necessary attribute appended:

<xs:element maxOccurs="unbounded" name="event">   <xs:complexType>     <xs:simpleContent>       <xs:extension base="string1024Type">         <xs:attribute default="list" name="node" type="xs:string"/>       </xs:extension>     </xs:simpleContent>   </xs:complexType> </xs:element>

both blocks could be in completely separate places of your schema. the important point is only following once again - you can't mix inheritance and attributing in the same element definition.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Converting A String To Int In Groovy

Answer : Use the toInteger() method to convert a String to an Integer , e.g. int value = "99".toInteger() An alternative, which avoids using a deprecated method (see below) is int value = "66" as Integer If you need to check whether the String can be converted before performing the conversion, use String number = "66" if (number.isInteger()) { int value = number as Integer } Deprecation Update In recent versions of Groovy one of the toInteger() methods has been deprecated. The following is taken from org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.StringGroovyMethods in Groovy 2.4.4 /** * Parse a CharSequence into an Integer * * @param self a CharSequence * @return an Integer * @since 1.8.2 */ public static Integer toInteger(CharSequence self) { return Integer.valueOf(self.toString().trim()); } /** * @deprecated Use the CharSequence version * @see #toInteger(CharSequence) */ @Deprecated public static Integer toInteger(String self) { return toInteg
Read more

"Cannot Create Cache Directory /home//.composer/cache/repo/https---packagist.org/, Or Directory Is Not Writable. Proceeding Without Cache"

Answer : if anyone pass through here, this is shorter solution: sudo chown -R $USER $HOME/.composer it seems to me the group information is missing in your command sudo chown -R <user> /home/<user>/.composer/cache/repo/https---packagist.org Shoud be sudo chown -R <user>:<group> /home/<user>/.composer/cache/repo/https---packagist.org But to avoid other permission issues, I would rather advise: sudo chown -R <user>:<group> /home/<user>/.composer/cache (you'll need access to other folders in there) and sudo chown <user>:<group> /home/<user>/.composer To make sure your user has permissions enough on the global composer folder. Mind the missing recursion so the user don't own keys created by root. If you need to find out the group: groups <user>
Read more

Android How Can I Convert A String To A Editable

Answer : As you probably found out, Editable is an interface so you cannot call new Editable() . However an Editable is nothing more than a String with Spannables, so use SpannableStringBuilder: Editable editable = new SpannableStringBuilder("Pass a string here"); If you only want to change the Spannables, never the text itself, you can use a basic SpannableString. Use Editable.Factory.getInstance().newEditable(str) From the android documentation: Returns a new SpannedStringBuilder from the specified CharSequence. You can override this to provide a different kind of Spanned.
Read more