Can An Optional Parameter Be Null In TypeScript?
Answer :
To answer my own question after trying...
The types null
and undefined
are handled as separate types. The optional type is special, also allowing arguments to be left out of function calls.
1. Without a union or optional, nothing except the type itself is allowed.
function foo(bar: string) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // Error foo(undefined); // Error foo() // Error
2. To additionally allow null
, a union with null
can be made.
function foo(bar: string | null) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // OK foo(undefined); // Error foo() // Error
3. Allowing undefined
works similarly. Note that the argument cannot be left out or null
.
function foo(bar: string | undefined) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // Error foo(undefined); // OK foo() // Error
4. You can also allow both, but the argument MUST still be given.
function foo(bar: string | null | undefined) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // OK foo(undefined); // OK foo() // Error
5. With optional you can leave the argument out, or pass undefined
, BUT NOT null
.
function foo(bar?: string) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // Error foo(undefined); // OK foo() // OK
6. To allow all three special cases, optional and null
can be combined.
function foo(bar?: string | null) { console.info(bar); } foo("Hello World!"); // OK foo(null); // OK foo(undefined); // OK foo() // OK
Also, optional is only usable in parameter or other type declarations, such as interfaces, not on regular variables. As it would make no sense to leave out the value of a variable when assigning to it.
Thus,
let d?: string;
would make no sense and results in a compilation error.
Comments
Post a Comment